Skip to main content

Parting thought on Swanevelt, Both, and Berchem at the Metropolitan Museum

When Melville visited the public galleries of London and Paris in 1849 and those of Italy, the Netherlands, and England in 1857 there were plenty of works by Swanevelt, Both, and Berchem on display. Each of these painters was also well represented in the 1853 issue of The Works of Eminent Masters that Melville acquired in 1871. The inaugural exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum in New York in 1872 featured one landscape by each of these artists, Italian landscapes by Swanevelt and Both, and a more intimate nature scene by Berchem. By time of Melville’s death in 1891, the paintings by Both and Berchem were still being exhibited in the Old Master Gallery Y, but the Swanevelt was no longer on display. All three paintings remained the property of the Museum until the early 1980s, when those by Swanevelt and Both were deaccessioned, with only the Berchem remaining in the collection today.  

Here we will take a quick look at the original paintings by Swanevelt, Both, and Berchem Melville could have seen at Metropolitan Museum beginning in 1872 as supplements to the five prints he was collecting after paintings by these three artists, further enriched by the texts and illustrations in his copy of The Works of Eminent Masters. 

The one Swanevelt acquired by the Metropolitan Museum during Melville’s lifetime was listed simply as Italian Landscape in the 1872 exhibition (cat. no. 82). It was a very small painting (4 ½ x 6 ¼ inches). Because it was deaccessioned in 1981, the only image I have so far found is the black-and-white thumbnail image appearing in Katherine Baetjer’s 2004 essay on “The Founding Purchase of 1871” (fig. 1 below). By the time it was auctioned off by Sotheby Parke Bernet in 1891, it had been demoted to “School of Herman van Swanevelt” (Appendix 2, no. 82, p. 234).  

CAT 218 after fig 1 Swanevelt Italian Landscape sotheby 1981 school of swanevelt.jpg

Figure 1. Herman van Swanevelt. Italian Landscape, oil on canvas, 4 ½ x 6 1/4 in. Inaugural Exhibition, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1872, no. 82. Deaccessioned, and auctioned at Sotheby Parke Bernet as School of Herman van Swanevelt, June 11, 1981, no. 157. 

 

The above painting was described in the 1872 catalog as “A charming little picture, worthy of Claude Lorrain, who was Swanevelt’s master” (no. 82, p. 37). Its subject resembled Melville’s two prints after Swanevelt in showing travelers and animals along a river bank in atmospheric light before a screen of trees. This little painting, however, is only half the size of his two prints, and whatever charm it may convey is hard to feel without its color. The catalog indicates that it had been in the collection of the Marquis Maison (European pedigree mattered in 1872). 


The one Both acquired by the Metropolitan Museum during Melville’s lifetime was also entitled simply Italian Landscape (fig. 2). The catalog credits the painting to Jan Both and his older brother Andries, a figure painter was thought to have collaborated in some of his brother’s landscapes. This very large painting (50 x 62 in.) received this detailed description in the 1872 catalog: “A view in Italy, with a rocky road overshadowed by fine trees. To the right in the foreground are several rocks surmounted by an oak; to the left, a horseman is asking his way of a man who follows him, and is setting off at a gallop through a rivulet which crosses the road: a beautiful landscape in the distance. To the left a mounted peasant and several other figures animate the scene. This is a capital production of the united talents of the brothers” (no. 52, pp. 28-29). 

CAT 218 after Fig 2 both Italian Landscape sothebys 1980 as Jacob de Heusch.jpg

Figure 2. Jan and Andries Both. Italian Landscape, oil on canvas, c. 1640. Inaugural exhibition, Metropolitan Museum, 1872, no. 52. Deaccessioned, and auctioned by Sotheby Parke Bernet in 1980 as by Jacob de Heusch. 


This painting is quite different in subject and style from the print after Both’s Vüe des Environs de Naples in Melville’s collection. This scene is much closer the Italian landscapes by Both reproduced in Melville’s copy of The Works of Eminent Masters (see our CAT 216). By the time this painting was deaccessioned by the Metropolitan Museum and sold by Sotheby Parke Bernet in 1980, it was attributed to Jacob de Heusch. He, like his uncle Willem de Heusch, was a Utrecht disciple of Jan Both who painted landscapes in Italy. Before being acquired by the Metropolitan Museum as a painting by Both, this Italian Landscape had been part of the celebrated collection of the Duc de Berry in France (Beatjer, no. 52, p. 230-31). 


The one painting by Nicholas Berchem in the Inaugural Exhibition of the Metropolitan Museum remains highly valued at the Museum today. Entitled simply Rest, and relatively small at 13 ½ x 17 inches, and described simply as “one of the best of the first manner of Berchem” in the catalog” (no. 159, p. 58), this intimate painting reads larger than its size (fig. 3).  

CAT 218 after fig 3 berchem Rest NY Met 1871.jpg

Figure 3. Nicholas Berchem. Rest, oil on wood, 1644. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1871 purchase, 1872 exhibition. 


The steer at the center of this painting dominates this canvas even more than the one at the center of Berchem’s Crossing the Brook (CAT 218). Its muted brown color is not nearly as striking as the bright white of the other, but its sharp silhouette against the high blue sky gives a sense of solidity and security to the image that extends down through the sheep resting on the ground, to the seated woman with the baby in her arms, to the man standing tall behind her, and to the dog nosing something on the ground behind them both. Young Henry James, the future novelist, did not mention the Italian Landscapes by Swanevelt or Both when reviewing the Inaugural Exhibition for June 1872 issue of the Atlantic Monthly, but he did mention Berchem. 


After noting that the great majority of 175 paintings were “of the Dutch and Flemish schools,” James turned his sophisticated focus to “the more important works.” These included paintings by Rubens, Van Dyck, Jordaens, Hals, Terburg, Netscher, Teniers, Van Ostade, Steen, Hobbema, Ruysdael, Berchem, and Breughel. Among all those, Berchem’s Rest was a “veritable pearl.” Even though “this charming little piece . . . is composed of elements more slender, possibly, than any of its companions, none of those have given us a more unmixed and tranquil pleasure. Surely, if human repose were ever to lose its precarious footing in our Western world, the idea would be tenderly embalmed in this delicious fragment of a pastoral.” Even though “a bare-legged shepherd, leaning on his staff above a sketchy tree, his wife on the ground nursing her baby, and a couple of meagre sheep, blinking at the noonday light, form the sum of its attractions,” this painting “lives, it smiles, it glows through the chill of time. Its sentiment is hardly more than a graceful trick; but the trick, performed for the hundredth time, still draws tears from the eyes” (p. 762). 


Rest was still the only painting by Berchem at the Metropolitan Museum when Walter Liedtke published his comprehensive account of the Dutch paintings in the collection in 2007. Tracing Berchem’s evolution in subject, style, and medium from the 1640s into the early 1680s, Liedtke marveled at a painter “so eclectic and versatile that his ideas seem to come from countless sources and at the same time to be all his own.” One of Berchem’s “earliest known works,” Rest was “painted in 1644, when he was about twenty-two or twenty-three years old.” Apart from the dog at the lower right, the figures in the painting were “prepared with underdrawing.” The compositional structure, “with trees to the side, figures resting beneath them . . . dates back to the mid-1630s in the work of Jan van Goyen.” The figure of the standing man is made from a drawing Berchem sketched “from life,” but in a pose that “can be traced back to the Farnese Hercules.” In 2007, the painting was still “well preserved” even though “the paint film and ground have become more transparent over time,” causing “the wooden support” to begin “assert itself visually, appearing as darkened spots in the sky” (no. 5, pp. 24-26). 


Berchem’s versatility and imagination are memorably expressed in Allegory of America, the drawing he created “as a model for an engraved title page in the second volume of an atlas on the Americas, Joan Blaeu’s Atlas Maior,” published in Amsterdam in 1662. Berchem made this drawing on a large sheet, 17 5/8 x 11 13/inches, with black chalk, brush, black ink, and gray wash (fig. 4). The drawing was donated to the Metropolitan Museum in 1959, three centuries after it was made. Berchem's intention, in the words of the Museum website, was to “reconfigure the New World allegory for a Dutch context by including a detailed setting alluding to trade and religion.” 

CAT 218 after fig 4 Berchem Allegory of America ny met 1959.jpg

Figure 4. Nicholas Berchem. Allegory of America, black chalk, brush, black ink, gray wash; incised for transfer, c. 1662. Designed as title page for second volume of an atlas on the Americas, Joan Bleu’s Atlas Major (Amsterdam, 1662). Metropolitan Museum of Art, Gift of the Estate of James Hazen Hyde, 1959. 

 

The care with Berchem designed and executed this drawing is evident by this description on the Museum website. “At the indigenous woman’s feet, another native pours out gold. A salamander and gold bars suggest the exoticism and riches associated with the Americas. Background scenes show the metal being mined, carried, and transported to a European vessel. Up in the clouds, European allegories convert natives to Christianity and battle the devil.” Only a few years before the 1662 volume was published in Amsterdam, Herman Melville’s ancestor Harmen Harmense Gansevoort sailed from Amsterdam for the "New Amsterdam" at the mouth of the Hudson River before moving upstream to seek his fortune on the present site of Albany, New York (“Allegory of America”). 

Parting thought on Swanevelt, Both, and Berchem at the Metropolitan Museum